Scott Colom Could Break a Mississippi Streak Older Than Most Voters

Scott Colom is running for the U.S. Senate in Mississippi, and if he wins he would be the state’s first Black senator since Reconstruction. That sentence deserves a moment. Mississippi has elected Black legislators, local officials, and members of Congress. It has not sent a Black person to the Senate since the years just after the Civil War.

The election is on November 3. Colom, a Democrat and district attorney, is challenging Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith. Independent Ty Pinkins is also on the ballot.

I want to be careful here. A close race is not a win. Mississippi remains a difficult state for Democrats, and President Donald Trump carried it by about 23 points in 2024. But the fact that this possibility is even being discussed says something about how much has changed in a short campaign season.

What Colom is offering

Colom is the district attorney for Mississippi’s 16th Judicial District, a post he has held since 2016. He has built his campaign around practical concerns: health care access, inflation, tariffs, and corruption.

His health care pitch is specific. He has said he would work to reverse Medicaid cuts and restore federal support tied to the Affordable Care Act. He has also called for a public option to give people another way to buy insurance.

On taxes, he supports eliminating federal income tax for people earning under $75,000 a year. Those are ordinary, kitchen-table proposals. They are aimed at people deciding whether a doctor visit can wait, whether the grocery bill fits, and whether the next paycheck will stretch far enough.

That matters. A Senate race can sound distant from daily life. This one keeps returning to costs, coverage, and who has to absorb them.

The history in the room

The historical fact is stark. No Black candidate has won statewide office in Mississippi since Reconstruction. The state has not elected a Democratic senator since the early 1980s.

Colom has not made the historical milestone the center of his campaign. He has said it is not what motivates him. I understand why. History can be an honor, but it can also become a burden. A candidate who is Black should not have to carry every expectation of repair in a state with such a long and painful political record.

Still, the meaning does not disappear because a candidate declines to dwell on it.

If Colom wins, the Senate would gain a Black senator from Mississippi for the first time since Reconstruction. That would be a change in who gets to stand in one of the most powerful rooms in American government. It would not erase the past. It would not settle arguments about voting rights, economic inequality, or the state’s political future. But it would alter the picture.

Why the race feels different

Colom has campaigned heavily across Mississippi. Reporting describes 60 town halls and a campaign food truck called “Mississippi Matters.” He has also outraised Hyde-Smith, according to campaign finance figures cited in public reporting.

National Democrats have noticed. Senate Majority PAC, the top Democratic Senate super PAC, announced a $1.2 million advertising campaign to support him. Several Democratic figures have traveled to the state to campaign for Colom in the final weeks.

None of that guarantees votes. Money buys television time and staff. It does not convince a voter who feels overlooked, priced out, or skeptical of both parties.

But it does signal that Democrats think the race is competitive enough to invest in. That is a real change from the usual assumption that Mississippi is settled before the first ballot is cast.

What would have to happen

Public reporting has described a simple, demanding path for Colom: very strong turnout among Black voters and support from roughly a quarter of white voters. That is not a vague hope. It is a measurable coalition.

The question is whether enough voters see Colom as someone who will represent them, rather than as a candidate defined by party labels or national attacks. Republicans have tried to frame him as too liberal and too radical. Colom’s response has been to emphasize his record as a prosecutor and his focus on affordability and health care.

There is also a late complication. Mississippi’s attorney general said Colom’s campaign removed two social media ads after a warning that they may have violated the state’s law on political deepfakes. The ads allegedly used Sen. Hyde-Smith’s likeness without consent. That is worth watching, though it is separate from the larger question of whether voters believe Colom’s argument about their lives.

Why I am paying attention

My first reaction was simple: this would be historic. Then I asked whether that reaction was doing too much work. A historic outcome should not excuse us from asking whether a candidate has a serious plan, whether the race is genuinely close, and what voters are actually being asked to decide.

Those questions have answers worth taking seriously. Colom is an experienced local prosecutor. He is running on health care, prices, and government accountability. His opponent is an incumbent senator in a state that has favored Republicans for decades.

The stakes are not abstract. A senator votes on Medicaid, insurance rules, taxes, courts, and federal spending. Those decisions reach households in Columbus, Jackson, Biloxi, and every small town in between.

If Colom loses, Mississippi will still have made a choice worth examining. If he wins, the result will be more than a partisan upset. It will mark a break in a political pattern that has held since Reconstruction.

That is why I keep reading the updates with more attention than I expected. Not because I know how this ends. Because, for once, the outcome is not already written.

Explore: Politics